Khazar Theory and a New Chronology

FastChef
FastChef

So I stumbled across people discussing a New Chronology here on 8ch sometime ago and I've slowly been looking into it not really convinced. That is until the Old Testament parts covered by Fomenko and his colleagues. I thought it was preposterous, but then I remembered Fomenko doesn't believe any history before 800's really exists. That it has all been falsified. Well when did the Khazars supposedly convert to Judaism? Around the 9th century. Where did they convert? Russia, Ukraine, Crimea, a few other places in that region. Where has "Jewish" power spread it's roots from? Those regions.

There was also recently https://archive.is/ajLWC where Israeli scientists links Ashkenazi to Turkic peoples and the Khazars were a Turkic people. Are we seeing the curtain being peeled back due to the large unfiltered flow of information? Could the house of cards built upon a foundation of centuries and centuries of lies come crashing down within our life times? Have any other /pol/acks noticed this connection or been looking into this at all?

All urls found in this thread:
https://archive.is/ajLWC
http://aryanism.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/The-Golem-Miguel-Serrano1.txt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thirteenth_Tribe
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/4279-chazars
https://archive.is/yzngu
Harmless_Venom
Harmless_Venom

@FastChef
oh fuck off

Sharpcharm
Sharpcharm

@Harmless_Venom
Hard to counter (kike)trips like this, but here's an attempt. There's a lot of (((coincidences))) in history that add up to all sorts of inconsitencies. The guys working on a New Chronology are quite reputable mechanical and mathematical scientists so I think if we're trying to view history through a lens that is not polished by the Jew maybe we should give them some of our attention. It could be a valuable tool for weeding out Jew lies.

LuckyDusty
LuckyDusty

Khazar theory is mostly bullshit. The Aschkenazi is basically the mix between ancient jews and the "caucasian race"(explaining their whiteness and "intelligence"). Most of them settled in Eastern Europe, Russia, ect…(regions that are directly north of israel which confirm the diaspora.) Probably the big amount of jews in the same region (and some convertion of the natives) created the Khazar kingdom. So the "they're not the true jews, original jews were good" is BULLSHIT.

Jews were a plague since Day One.

cum2soon
cum2soon

@LuckyDusty
Who is saying anything about "original jews were good"? Fomenko believes the New Testament was written before the Old Testament. That the timeline as we know it is mostly bullshit and history falsified. If the Khazars were in Russia and some of the things in the Old Testament were written about events in Russia(which Fomenko believes) and not the Levant, then maybe there is some link between the two theories. Maybe the Khazars thought to expand the OT under their own volition to try and increase their influence. Remember written word was and still is very powerful. The memes are real.

PackManBrainlure
PackManBrainlure

@Sharpcharm
It could be a valuable tool for weeding out Jew lies.

Yes.

@cum2soon
Fomenko believes the New Testament was written before the Old Testament.

I think there was another OT, and that the new OT was written to get control over the Christians.

Burnblaze
Burnblaze

@cum2soon
Just seen "christians" in youtube using this as an excuse to follow the (((old testament))).

but this:
Fomenko believes the New Testament was written before the Old Testament.

is interesting.

RavySnake
RavySnake

@PackManBrainlure
I think there was another OT, and that the new OT was written to get control over the Christians.

This.

Illusionz
Illusionz

@FastChef
Khazar theory is debunked and was even made up by a jew

Fried_Sushi
Fried_Sushi

@PackManBrainlure
Fomenko isn't the only source I've heard say the current OT was written after the NT either. There's many others who believe this as well who are totally unaffiliated with Fomenko and the others associated with a New Chronology.

Inmate
Inmate

@Illusionz
shilling this lazily
I am not sold on the Khazar Theory 100%, I'm stating maybe there is some value to it if we look at history from a different perspective. There seems to be a mathematical foundation to Fomenko's theories and unless he can be mathematically disproven he has a solid argument.

Also, counter recent genetic and linguistic evidence.

Poker_Star
Poker_Star

Look if Jews are actively trying to write themselves as histories first people, that is fucking significant.

BunnyJinx
BunnyJinx

@FastChef
NewChron is just a slav-centric view of history… in that nothing happened until Slavs appeared. No history in Western Europe prior to the 14th century. No Rome, Charlemagne, Anglo-Saxons, no crusades to jerusalem etc.

Slavs were Rome-Byzantium-Jerusalem-Jesus-Mongolians-Christianity-Greece all rolled into one. Slavs had a super-empire that broke up, and then evil west yuropoors made up a whole new history to look good and make slavs look bad.

For some reason, the byzantine orthodox church agreed to this revision of history despite knowing the truth.

It's their version of "We wuz kangz".

TurtleCat
TurtleCat

@LuckyDusty
The Israelites were white.

Soft_member
Soft_member

@LuckyDusty
got some questions to understand you. what would you call a jew who converted 2000 years ago when he saw jesus christ? what would you call his descendants today?

@PackManBrainlure
@RavySnake
you are right there are two OTs, the one written after jesus by talmuds and the one before. The AD one is used by protestants, everyone else uses the original. fyi the AD one is called masoretic text and the original is called the septuagint.

@TurtleCat
mediterranean was quite white before fall of rome/muhammad.

SomethingNew
SomethingNew

@BunnyJinx
Disprove the math. Your diversion is classic kike tactic.

Also, it doesn't say none of that didn't happen, just that it didn't happen the way we were told it happened. He doesn't dispute the Czar being killed and we all know the Czar wasn't Slavic soooo there goes your "we wuz kangz" attempt to slander Slavs.

Evilember
Evilember

@BunnyJinx
in that nothing happened until Slavs appeared.

And that could be true, if the word Slavs is just the old church slavonic translation of some other name.

Gigastrength
Gigastrength

If the Jews of today are really descended from Khazars, not from the "real Jews" of the Bible, then why are the Jews of today acting like they did in ancient Egypt and Babylon?

Harmless_Venom
Harmless_Venom

@Gigastrength
"Jews of the bible" they are if they were involved in writing their own history at the time they "converted". Think of it like all the faggot fandoms of today except aristocracy so they have immense cultural influence. (((SJW))) faggotry is an obvious attempt of replicating this effective strategy.

Spazyfool
Spazyfool

@SomethingNew
@Evilember
I'm more familiar with the theory than you fags. Spent years actually believing it until I researched archaeology.

There are ruins 3 layers deep in Western Europe that confirm all the traditional history… or did the jesuits just bury all these cities 500 years ago.

viagrandad
viagrandad

@Gigastrength

Khazar theory is incorrect I think, at least in the sense that was the origin of what we refer to as Jews today. The origins predate the Khazar empire, which is not to say the Khazar empire did not exist ( I'm not sure either way ).

http://aryanism.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/The-Golem-Miguel-Serrano1.txt

VisualMaster
VisualMaster

@Evilember
It's an alternate character reading of "Hwan". Slavs are Ancient Koreans confirmed.

BinaryMan
BinaryMan

@Evilember

The origin of slav just means "warrior" or something like that. But that all people east of Germany are 'slavs' is just Soviet imperial propaganda. In reality they vary a lot genetically, some have very little relation at all.

BunnyJinx
BunnyJinx

@Spazyfool
Provide proofs then. He has mathematically proven that current chronological methods are false. Other mathematicians, even professors in the USA, have backed his math.

Nude_Bikergirl
Nude_Bikergirl

@BinaryMan
"Slav" means speaker as in speaker of the Slavic language (as opposed to niemcy, meaning non speaker). Slavs are a linguistic group that mostly comprises Iranic Scytho-Sarmatian peoples.

SniperGod
SniperGod

@Illusionz
Khazar theory is debunked and was even made up by a jew

This isn't all directed at you, but:

If you're talking about Arthur Koestler's 13th Tribe, the Khazar stuff was around way before that book was written.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thirteenth_Tribe
The Thirteenth Tribe is a 1976 book by Arthur Koestler, in which he advances the thesis that Ashkenazi Jews are not descended from the historical Israelites of antiquity, but from Khazars, a Turkic people.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/4279-chazars
https://archive.is/yzngu

That article is from the 1906 jewish encyclopedia.

People are poo-pooing the khazar theory because they think it somehow lets jews get out of being dicks, which it doesn't. Jews want to disprove it because they think it breaks their connection to the bible.
The whole "the bad jews of today are really khazars and are not the true jews" is a game people play when they don't have the courage to just say "it's the jews".
I've seen scientific studies that say it is true and it isn't true. This is like the Solutrean theory, it's going to piss people off, so there's going to be a lot of "debunking" going on.

Jews are a race. An "anti-race" of mongrels. The whole Khazaria story fits right in with that.

5mileys
5mileys

@SniperGod
Right. They are fucking with timelines and history because if they can establish they were FIRST, then they get to claim all has come from them. The "chosen people" narrative is there and who can deny it? Goddamn kikes.

Disable your ad blocker to access the content

Disable your ad blocker to access the content